<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Inc. (KMANPUB)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Health Nexus</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 16</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Multiclass Prediction of Vascular Complication Profiles in Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Study</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Multiclass Prediction of Vascular Complication Profiles in Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Study</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>17</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;Vascular complications are common and heterogeneous in type 2 diabetes, yet multiclass classification is challenging because of substantial class imbalance. This study evaluated interpretable machine-learning approaches for characterizing microvascular and macrovascular complication profiles. After removing duplicated clinical profiles, 1,068 profiles were classified into four categories: no complications, microvascular only, macrovascular only, and both. Multiple machine-learning models and imbalance-handling strategies were compared using stratified five-fold cross-validation and an independent test set. Performance was assessed using macro-F1, balanced accuracy, class-specific metrics, bootstrap confidence intervals, and SHAP-based feature interpretation. SMOTENC achieved the strongest overall balance between minority-class performance and discrimination, with a cross-validation macro-F1 of 0.273 ± 0.011 and balanced accuracy of 0.294 ± 0.026. On the independent test set, macro-F1 was 0.277 (95% CI, 0.213–0.343) and balanced accuracy was 0.299 (95% CI, 0.220–0.385). The macrovascular-only class remained particularly difficult to distinguish. Medication adherence, smoking, physical activity, sex, and medication use were among the most influential features. Machine-learning classification of vascular complication profiles remains challenging in this imbalanced dataset. Nevertheless, explicit imbalance handling and class-balanced evaluation provided a more informative assessment of model performance than accuracy alone. These findings support the use of interpretable, imbalance-aware frameworks for future studies and highlight the need for larger, longitudinal, and externally validated datasets before clinical application.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Diabetes and its complications</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">	Machine learning</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Study design and data source</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/Health-Nexus/article/download/6657/12342</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
