<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Inc. (KMANPUB)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Applied Family Therapy Journal (AFTJ) </JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3041-8798</Issn>
      <Volume>5</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 21</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Comparing the Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Skills Training Based on Tolman's and Bandura's Theories on Adolescent Girls'  Problem-Solving Styles</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Comparing the Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Skills Training Based on Tolman's and Bandura's Theories on Adolescent Girls'  Problem-Solving Styles</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>227</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>234</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.aftj.5.2.25</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of problem-solving skills training based on the theories of Tolman and Bandura on the problem-solving styles of middle school students.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; The research method was quasi-experimental. The population consisted of all female first-year middle school students in Hamadan, with a sample size of 75 students (three groups of 25), selected through multi-stage cluster sampling. The D'Zurilla, Nezu, and Maydeu-Olivares problem-solving questionnaire (2000) was used for data collection. Problem-solving training sessions based on Tolman's theory followed a protocol provided by Tolman (1932), and those based on Bandura's theory followed a protocol by Bandura (1999), conducted over eight 60-minute weekly sessions for two months. Data were analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and the Scheffé post hoc test.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; There were differences in the impact of training based on these theories on students' problem-solving styles (P &amp;lt; .01). Training based on Tolman's theory was more effective in reducing the use of negative and impulsive problem-solving styles compared to training based on Bandura's theory (P &amp;lt; .01).&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; These trainings increased the use of positive and logical orientation styles and decreased the use of negative, avoidant, and impulsive styles among students.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Problem-solving style</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">problem-solving skills</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">student</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/aftj/article/download/2461/3333</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
