<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Inc.</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume></Volume>
      <Issue>In Press</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Transformer-Based Multi-Horizon Traffic Forecasting in Bulk Port Environments</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Transformer-Based Multi-Horizon Traffic Forecasting in Bulk Port Environments</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage></FirstPage>
    <LastPage></LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;Reliable multi-horizon traffic forecasts can improve operational planning at bulk ports, but the performance of data-intensive forecasting models depends on training-set size and forecast horizon. This study compares seven architectures—ARIMA, LSTM, GRU, a standard Transformer, PatchTST, iTransformer, and the Temporal Fusion Transformer—using aggregate vehicle counts and mean speeds generated by a statistically checked agent-based discrete-event simulation. Forecasts cover short (15–30-minute), medium (seven-day), and long (30-day) horizons. A preliminary 569-observation short-horizon experiment favored ARIMA; after expanding the simulated short-horizon series to 51,840 observations, all six deep models outperformed that baseline. For 15-minute vehicle-count prediction, PatchTST achieved R² = 0.4921 compared with ARIMA's R² = 0.3632. Mean R² varied non-monotonically across short, medium, and long horizon tiers (0.290, 0.517, and 0.325, respectively). The greatest transformer advantages emerged in longer-horizon speed forecasts, where PatchTST attained R² values of 0.9821 and 0.9741 at the medium and long tiers. Feature-ablation results suggested that the value of additional predictors depended on sample availability. A supplementary evaluation using independent DT-CARGO truck telemetry supported the advantage of deep approaches over ARIMA, although recurrent models slightly surpassed transformer variants on that external series. These findings support horizon- and data-aware model selection rather than a universal architectural ranking. Results based on simulation require validation in operational bulk-port settings.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Transformer-Based Traffic Forecasting, Port Traffic Forecasting, Multi-Horizon Time Series, Discrete-Event Simulation</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf"></ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
