<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Inc. (KMANPUB)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Assessment and Research in Applied Counseling (JARAC)</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>8</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 29</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Using Artificial Chatbots as Academic Counselors; When Chatgpt Becomes an Academic Counselor (A Case Study of Chatgpt)</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Using Artificial Chatbots as Academic Counselors; When Chatgpt Becomes an Academic Counselor (A Case Study of Chatgpt)</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>8</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.jarac.2987</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year> 2025</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>04</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; This research aimed to investigate the use of artificial intelligence chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, as academic counselors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods and Materials:&lt;/strong&gt; A qualitative case study design was employed, involving 10 unstructured interview sessions with ChatGPT across three iterative rounds of analysis. Comparative coding with a deductive approach was used to analyze ChatGPT’s responses to academic counseling scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; The findings revealed thirteen subthemes organized under two main themes: strengths and weaknesses. Strengths included providing multifaceted perspectives, suggesting resources, and generating effective study strategies, while weaknesses included a lack of empathy, personal opinion, and foresight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Although ChatGPT cannot replace professional counselors, results suggest it may function as a semi-professional academic counselor capable of delivering effective guidance in logical, non-emotional contexts. Validity was ensured by comparing ChatGPT’s responses with other AI chatbots, namely Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot, and ensuring consistency across coding iterations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">academic counsultation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">case study</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">artificial intelligence</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">ChatGPT</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/jarac/article/download/2987/8667</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
