<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Inc. (KMANPUB)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Personality and Psychosomatic Research (JPPR)</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3041-8542</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>28</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Motivational Interviewing: Reducing Social Desirability Bias and Stress Vulnerability in Adults</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Motivational Interviewing: Reducing Social Desirability Bias and Stress Vulnerability in Adults</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>12</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>19</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.jppr.1.3.3</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing (MI) in reducing social desirability bias and vulnerability to stress among adults. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 40 participants randomly assigned to either an intervention group (20 participants) or a control group (20 participants). The intervention group received ten 60-minute sessions of MI, while the control group received no intervention. Assessments for social desirability and vulnerability to stress were conducted at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at a four-month follow-up. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measurements and Bonferroni post-hoc tests. At baseline, the intervention group had mean scores of 24.35 (SD = 3.12) for social desirability and 30.45 (SD = 5.27) for vulnerability to stress. Post-intervention, these scores significantly decreased to 18.75 (SD = 2.89) for social desirability and 21.30 (SD = 4.82) for vulnerability to stress. At the four-month follow-up, the intervention group maintained reduced scores of 19.10 (SD = 3.05) for social desirability and 22.05 (SD = 4.75) for vulnerability to stress. ANOVA results indicated significant between-subjects effects for social desirability (F(1, 38) = 92.45, p &amp;lt; .001) and vulnerability to stress (F(1, 38) = 105.92, p &amp;lt; .001). Bonferroni post-hoc tests confirmed significant reductions between baseline and post-intervention for both social desirability (mean difference = 5.60, p &amp;lt; .001) and vulnerability to stress (mean difference = 9.15, p &amp;lt; .001). Motivational Interviewing significantly reduces social desirability bias and vulnerability to stress among adults, with effects sustained over a four-month period. These findings support the use of MI in enhancing self-report accuracy and stress resilience in various therapeutic settings.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Motivational Interviewing</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Social Desirability</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Stress Vulnerability</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Randomized Controlled Trial</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Behavioral Change</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Psychological Intervention</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/jppr/article/download/2565/3559</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
