Comparison of the Effectiveness of Adolescent-Specific Psychological Security Training with Adolescent-Centered Mindfulness Training on the Altruism of Adolescents with Psychological Insecurity

Alireza Fatahi Dolatabadi; Seyed Hamid Atashpour; Mohsen Golparvar

doi:10.61838/kman.aftj.5.3.25

Authors

Alireza Fatahi Dolatabadi 1 PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Seyed Hamid Atashpour * Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran hamidatashpour@gmail.com

Mohsen Golparvar Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aftj.5.3.25

Keywords:

Psychological Security, Adolescents, Mindfulness, Well-Being

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of adolescent-specific psychological security training with adolescent-centered mindfulness training on the well-being of adolescents experiencing psychological insecurity.

Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up phases, involving two experimental groups and one control group. The population included all male students aged 14 to 16 years in the city of Isfahan. Sixty students were selected through convenience sampling and then randomly assigned to the study groups. The research instrument was the Ryff Well-Being Questionnaire (1989). All three groups were assessed at three stages: pre-test, post-test, and follow-up using this instrument. The first experimental group received well-being training, while the second group received adolescent-centered mindfulness training. The control group was placed on a waiting list. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (repeated measures analysis of variance).

Findings: The results indicated that both methods were effective in improving the well-being of these adolescents, and there was no significant difference between the two experimental groups in this regard (P = 0.05).

Conclusion: It can be concluded that both methods can enhance the psychological well-being of this group of adolescents.