Conceptualizing Communicative Citizenship in the Fragmented Public Sphere of the Media City: A Meta-Synthesis Approach

Authors

Keywords:

communicative citizenship, media city, fragmented public sphere, meta-synthesis, communicative action, platform governance

Abstract

This study conceptualizes communicative citizenship within the fragmented public sphere of the media city. As urban life becomes deeply entangled with platforms, data infrastructures, and algorithmic systems, classical citizenship—primarily defined through legal rights, duties, and institutional participation—has become insufficient for explaining contemporary forms of civic agency. Using a qualitative meta-synthesis, 32 scholarly documents selected through a PRISMA-guided screening process were critically interpreted across communication studies, urban sociology, platform studies, and critical smart-city research. The synthesis identifies five interrelated themes: the paradigmatic transformation of citizenship; the media city as a hybrid space of power; the political economy of platforms and extraction; the digital public sphere as a simultaneous site of enablement and constraint; and critical smart-city governance. Across these themes, communicative citizenship emerges as a dynamic position generated through the interaction of structure, agency, and context. It ranges from the passive citizen-as-data, whose everyday activity is converted into economic value, to the active citizen-as-network or communicative citizen, capable of dialogue, mobilization, meaning-making, and participatory regulation. The findings suggest that communicative citizenship is not a fixed legal status but a contested process shaped by unequal infrastructures, platform monopolization, algorithmic governance, and citizens’ capacity for critical engagement. Equitable access to communication infrastructures, critical media literacy, and protection of urban-media spaces for dialogue are therefore central conditions for strengthening communicative citizenship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Polity. Amin, A. and N. Thrift (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban, Polity.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571980074750071040

Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160

Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45

Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press. http://www.unm.edu/~rlwood/Richard_Wood/TEACHING_files/Soc514syl.Spring2009.final.pdf

Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uQv2VH-wmHwC&oi=fnd&pg=PP7&dq=Habermas,+J.+(1987).+The+theory+of+communicative+action:+Vol.+2.+Lifeworld+and+system:+A+critique+of+functionalist+reason,+Beacon+Press.+%09&ots=SAboxISN2t&sig=iQhWQUu5XovGNyzFjpk6RRQfc0o

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. https://www.academia.edu/download/73747464/632c3f986c8c699fd73ab75298be033b161f.pdf

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.

Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Acts of citizenship. Zed Books. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=-TpOEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Isin,+E.+F.+and+G.+M.+Nielsen+(2008).+Acts+of+citizenship,+Zed+Books.+%09&ots=zeIJw5J4MW&sig=SnzEipzY8h5xPxcvvfRqW3w7kxo

McQuire, S. (2008). The media city: Media, architecture and urban space. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446269572

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Polity. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=cNMhtalEJDUC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Papacharissi,+Z.+(2010).+A+private+sphere:+Democracy+in+a+digital+age,+Polity.+%09&ots=DjJqo9q6Nr&sig=v0nPGESuhrahTBQp5tvqZrG01E0

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.

van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hosseini, S. A. H., Soleimani, N. ., Ghaiyoomi, A. ., & Hosseini, S. B. . (2027). Conceptualizing Communicative Citizenship in the Fragmented Public Sphere of the Media City: A Meta-Synthesis Approach. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1-12. https://journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/aitechbesosci/article/view/5918