Conceptualizing Communicative Citizenship in the Fragmented Public Sphere of the Media City: A Meta-Synthesis Approach

Seyed Amir Hossein Hosseini; Neda  Soleimani; Abbasali  Ghaiyoomi; Seyed Bashir  Hosseini

Authors

Seyed Amir Hossein Hosseini Department of Cultural and Media Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1687-8167
Neda Soleimani Department of Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran Corresponding Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-0133
Abbasali Ghaiyoomi Department of cultural and media management,SR.C, Islamic Azad Univercity, Tehran, iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-7461
Seyed Bashir Hosseini Department of Media Management, Faculty of Communication and Media, IRIB University, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2396-6396

Keywords:

communicative citizenship, media city, fragmented public sphere, meta-synthesis, communicative action, platform governance

Abstract

This study conceptualizes communicative citizenship within the fragmented public sphere of the media city. As urban life becomes deeply entangled with platforms, data infrastructures, and algorithmic systems, classical citizenship—primarily defined through legal rights, duties, and institutional participation—has become insufficient for explaining contemporary forms of civic agency. Using a qualitative meta-synthesis, 32 scholarly documents selected through a PRISMA-guided screening process were critically interpreted across communication studies, urban sociology, platform studies, and critical smart-city research. The synthesis identifies five interrelated themes: the paradigmatic transformation of citizenship; the media city as a hybrid space of power; the political economy of platforms and extraction; the digital public sphere as a simultaneous site of enablement and constraint; and critical smart-city governance. Across these themes, communicative citizenship emerges as a dynamic position generated through the interaction of structure, agency, and context. It ranges from the passive citizen-as-data, whose everyday activity is converted into economic value, to the active citizen-as-network or communicative citizen, capable of dialogue, mobilization, meaning-making, and participatory regulation. The findings suggest that communicative citizenship is not a fixed legal status but a contested process shaped by unequal infrastructures, platform monopolization, algorithmic governance, and citizens’ capacity for critical engagement. Equitable access to communication infrastructures, critical media literacy, and protection of urban-media spaces for dialogue are therefore central conditions for strengthening communicative citizenship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Polity.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160

de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022

Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45

Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (Eds.). (2008). Acts of citizenship. Zed Books.

McQuire, S. (2008). The media city: Media, architecture and urban space. SAGE.

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Polity.

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.

van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.