Factor Structure of the Brief Inventory of Personality Organization and Its Convergence with DSM-5 Personality Disorders
Keywords:
Personality Organization, Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO), DSM-5 Personality Disorders, Maladaptive Personality Traits, Reality Testing, Personality Assessment, Factor Analysis, Psychometric PropertiesAbstract
The present study aimed to examine the factorial structure of the Brief Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-30) in an Iranian nonclinical population and to investigate its convergence with DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits and structural personality functioning. This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on 162 participants from the general population, including 47 men and 115 women aged 17 to 66 years. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling and assessed using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO), the 30-item Brief Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-30), and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation, and confirmatory factor analysis using SPSS version 23 and AMOS version 24. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the original two-factor model of the IPO-30 did not fit the data adequately (χ²/df = 3.28, CFI = 0.549, GFI = 0.563, AGFI = 0.497, RMSEA = 0.119). Exploratory factor analysis yielded a revised 26-item, four-factor structure consisting of Reality Testing, Moral Values, Aggression, and Defense & Identity. These four factors explained a substantial proportion of the total variance and demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients exceeding 0.70. Furthermore, all extracted personality organization dimensions showed significant positive correlations with all five maladaptive personality trait domains of the PID-5, including Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism (p < .01), supporting convergent validity. In contrast, correlations between the IPO-derived factors and most STIPO dimensions were not statistically significant, except for a small negative association between the Moral Values factor and the STIPO Moral Values domain (p < .05). The findings indicate that the original two-factor structure of the Brief Inventory of Personality Organization is not fully supported in the Iranian population. Instead, a culturally adapted four-factor, 26-item model demonstrated superior psychometric properties, acceptable reliability, and meaningful associations with DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits.
Downloads
References
Abdi, R., & Mardani, L. S. (2018). Structural Relationships of Abnormal Personality Dimensions with Driving Behavior through the Mediation of Emotion Regulation. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Police Medicine, 2(2).
American Psychiatric, A. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Ravan Publishing.
Amini, M. (2018). Assessment of Personality Functioning in Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 28(167), 121-132.
Amiri, S. (2017). Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Adult Personality Inventory Compatible with DSM-5. Thought and Behavior, 12(46).
Clarkin, J. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Transference-Focused Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Clinical Guide. American Psychiatric Publishing.
Ellison, W. D., & Levy, K. N. (2012). Factor Structure of the Primary Scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization in a Nonclinical Sample Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. Psychological assessment, 24(2), 503-517.
Hemmati, A. (2018). Validation of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R): Determining Consistency with the SCL-90-R Clinical Symptom Checklist and the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) University of Kurdistan, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology].
Horz-Sagstetter, S., Caligor, E., Preti, E., Stern, B. L., De Panfilis, C., & Clarkin, J. F. (2017). Clinician-Guided Assessment of Personality Using the Structural Interview and the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 30-42.
Kurt, Y., & Çakır, Z. (2025). Childhood maltreatment and borderline personality organization: The mediating roles of attachment and mentalizing. Personality and individual differences, 242, 113218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113218
Newcomb, K. M., Yalch, M. M., & Levendosky, A. A. (2024). Association between dimensions of borderline personality organization and pathological narcissism. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 41(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000474
Preti, E., Di Pierro, R., Costantini, G., Benzi, I. M. A., De Panfilis, C., & Madeddu, F. (2018). Using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization for DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Rating Performed by Inexperienced Raters. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 621-629.
Preti, E., Prunas, A., De Panfilis, C., Marchesi, C., Madeddu, F., & Clarkin, J. F. (2015). The Facets of Identity: Personality Pathology Assessment through the Inventory of Personality Organization. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6(2), 129-140.
Sadock, B., Sadock, V., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (9th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Sagstetter, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2020). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric Properties, Factorial Composition, and Criterion Relations with Affect, Aggressive Dyscontrol, Psychosis Proneness, and Self-Domains in a Nonclinical Sample. Psychological assessment, 13(4), 577-591.
Salman Nasab, A., Yusefi, R., & Yagubi, H. (2024). Comparison of Personality Organization in People with Dark and Bright Personality Traits. Iranian Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(4), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jndd.2.4.4
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Conscientiousness and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 161-174.
Sepahvand, R., tahour, M. A., Salimi, S. H., Rahnejat, A. M., & Sepandi, M. (2025). Structural Modeling of Self-Harming Behaviors Based on Personality Organization With the Mediating Role of Childhood Traumas and Reflective Function in Militaries With Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy People. Journal of education and health promotion, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_560_24
Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). The Convergent Structure of DSM-5 Personality Trait Facets and Five-Factor Model Trait Domains. Assessment, 20(3), 308-311.
Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). An Interpersonal Analysis of Pathological Personality Traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19(3), 263-275.
Yun, S., Jo, S. H., Jeon, H. J., Kim, H. G., Cheon, E. J., & Koo, B. H. (2024). Network analysis of personality factors and defense styles in borderline personality organization. Psychiatry Investigation, 21(6), 672-679. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0085
Zimmermann, J., Benecke, C., Horz-Sagstetter, S., & Dammann, G. (2015). Norming of the German-Language 16-Item Version of the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-16). Zeitschrift fuer Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 61(1), 5-18.
Downloads
Additional Files
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted