Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Gymnastics Training Program and Teaching Games for Understanding on Improving Gross Motor Skills in Children Aged 4 to 11 Years

Authors

    Meysam Rezaee Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
    Sepideh Shakerian Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
    Sasan Bahremand Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
    Maedeh Ahmadpour * PhD Student, Department of Sports Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Maedeh.ahmadpour@ut.ac.ir
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.intjssh.8.1.7

Keywords:

Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU), gymnastics training, gross motor skills, children, physical education, motor skill development

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a gymnastics training program and the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) approach in enhancing gross motor skills among children aged 4 to 11 years.

Methods and Materials: A quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test structure was employed. Sixty girls aged 4 to 11 years from Mashhad, who had no prior experience in gymnastics, were recruited using convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned to either the gymnastics training group or the TGfU group, each further divided into two age-based subgroups (4\u20137 years and 8\u201311 years). Gross motor skills were assessed using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a one-way multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) to determine differences between the groups.

Findings: Both the gymnastics training program and TGfU approach significantly improved gross motor skills. However, the TGfU group showed a greater increase in mean post-test scores compared to the gymnastics group. ANCOVA results confirmed a statistically significant difference in motor skill improvement between the two interventions, with TGfU exhibiting a stronger overall effect. These findings highlight TGfU\u2019s ability to integrate cognitive engagement and contextual learning, resulting in greater enhancements in motor skill development.

Conclusion: The TGfU approach demonstrated superior effectiveness in enhancing gross motor skills compared to gymnastics training. While gymnastics promotes strength and balance through structured routines, TGfU fosters intrinsic motivation and cognitive understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Arias AG, Claver F, Práxedes A, Álvarez FdV, Harvey S.

Autonomy Support, Motivational Climate, Enjoyment and Perceived

Competence in Physical Education: Impact of a Hybrid Teaching

Games for Understanding/Sport Education Unit. European Physical

Education Review. 2018;26(1):36-53. [DOI]

2. Arias AG, Diloy-Peña S, Sevil‐Serrano J, García-González

L, Abós Á. A Hybrid TGfU/SE Volleyball Teaching Unit for

Enhancing Motivation in Physical Education: A Mixed-Method

Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

Health. 2020;18(1):110. [PMID: 33375232] [PMCID: PMC7795743]

[DOI]

3. Arias AG, Harvey S, Cárceles A, Práxedes A, Álvarez FdV.

Impact of a Hybrid TGfU-Sport Education Unit on Student Motivation

in Physical Education. Plos One. 2017;12(6):e0179876. [PMID:

28658267] [PMCID: PMC5489183] [DOI]

4. Arias AG, Harvey S, García-Herreros F, González-Víllora

S, Práxedes A, Domínguez AM. Effect of a Hybrid Teaching Games

for Understanding/Sport Education Unit on Elementary Students’ SelfDetermined Motivation in Physical Education. European Physical

Education Review. 2020;27(2):366-83. [PMID: 28658267] [PMCID:

PMC5489183] [DOI]

5. Mnejja K, García‐Soidan JL, Romo‐Perez V, Sahli S.

Postural balance under sensory manipulation predicted fine and gross

motor skills in children from 5 to 6 years of age. Acta Paediatrica.

2023;112(7):1524-9. [PMID: 36951623] [DOI]

6. Li Y. The Effects of the Teaching Games for Understanding

(TGFU) Mode Adopted in a College Basketball Program. Journal of

Education and Learning. 2024;13(4):134. [DOI]

7. Aryanti S, Azhar S, Tangkudung J, Yusmawati Y, Ilahi BR,

Okilanda A. Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) Model

Learning for Overhead Pass Volleyball in Elementary School Students.

International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences.

2022;10(4):677-82. [DOI]

8. Nathan S. Badminton Instructional in Malaysian Schools: A

Comparative Analysis of TGfU and SDT Pedagogical Models.

Springerplus. 2016;5(1). [PMID: 27516953] [PMCID: PMC4967053]

[DOI]

9. Baumgarten S, Pagnano-Richardson K. Educational

gymnastics: Enhancing children's physical literacy. Journal of Physical

Education, Recreation & Dance. 2010;81(4):18-25. [DOI]

10. Hafez R. Effect of Brain Gym on manipulating skills and

balance for beginners in rhythmic gymnastics. Science, Movement, and

Health. 2017;17(1):66-72.

11. Semão FA, Ana Claudia de Souza H, Bertin LD, Oliveira

RFd. Proprioception Influence in the Balance of Gymnastics Rhythmic

Postural Athletes. Manual Therapy Posturology & Rehabilitation

Journal. 2015:1-5. [DOI]

12. Saleh V, Afroundeh R, Siahkouhian M, Asadi A. Effect of

an 8-Week Anaerobic Gymnastics Training on Static, Dynamic

Balance and Body Composition in Obese and Normal-Weight

Children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2021;8(2):81-91.

13. Moreno FJ, Reina R, Luis V, Sabido R. Visual search

strategies in experienced and inexperienced gymnastic coaches.

Perceptual and Motor skills. 2002;95(3):901-2. [PMID: 12509194]

[DOI]

14. Chow J, Davids K, Button C, Renshaw I, Shuttleworth R,

Uehara L. Nonlinear pedagogy: implications for teaching games for

understanding (TGfU). TGfU: simply good pedagogy: understanding

a complex challenge2009. p. 131-43

15. Booth E, Kokkranikal J, Burukina OA. Russian Artistic

Gymnastics as a Sports Tourism Product: Some Observations and a

Research Agenda. 2015:81-96. [PMID: PMC4491260] [DOI]

16. Jarrett K, Harvey S. Similar, but Not the Same: Comparing

the Game Based Approaches of Teaching Games for Understanding

(TGfU) and Game Sense. Ejournal De La Recherche Sur L

Intervention en Éducation Physique Et Sport -Ejrieps. 2016(38). [DOI]

17. Wang L, Ha AS. Mentoring in TGfU Teaching. European

Physical Education Review. 2012;18(1):47-61. [DOI]

18. Bagøien TE, Halvari H, Nesheim H. Self-Determined

Motivation in Physical Education and Its Links to Motivation for

Leisure-Time Physical Activity, Physical Activity, and Well-Being in

General. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2010;111(2):407-32. [PMID:

21162443] [DOI]

19. Claver F, Martínez-Aranda LM, Conejero M, Gil-Arias A.

Motivation, Discipline, and Academic Performance in Physical

Education: A Holistic Approach From Achievement Goal and SelfDetermination Theories. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11. [PMID:

32903702] [PMCID: PMC7438928] [DOI]

20. Gil-Arias A, Diloy-Peña S, Sevil-Serrano J, GarcíaGonzález L, Abós Á. A hybrid tgfu/se volleyball teaching unit for

enhancing motivation in physical education: A mixed-method

approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

Health. 2021;18(1):110. [PMID: 33375232] [PMCID: PMC7795743]

21. Debien PB, Timoteo TF, Gabbett TJ, Bara Filho MG.

Training-Load Management in Rhythmic Gymnastics: Practices and

Perceptions of Coaches, Medical Staff, and Gymnasts. Int J Sports

Physiol Perform. 2022;17(4):530-40. [PMID: 35016155] [DOI]

22. López-Lemus I. Could the Hybridization of the SE/TGfU

Pedagogical Models Be an Alternative for Learning Sports and

Promoting Health? School Context Study. Children. 2023;10(5):877.

[PMID: 37238425] [PMCID: PMC10217109] [DOI]

23. Gustian U. Effectiveness of Teaching Games for

Understanding (TGfU): Using a Modified Kasti Game to Stimulate

Elementary School Students’ Motor Skills. Edu Sportivo Indonesian

Journal of Physical Education. 2024;5(1):54-63. [DOI]

24. Pan Y, Huang C-H, Hsu W-T. A Comparison of the

Learning Effects Between TGfU-SE and TGfU on Learning

Motivation, Sport Enjoyment, Responsibility, and Game Performance

in Physical Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. [PMID:

37519367] [PMCID: PMC10374309] [DOI]

25. Pratama A. The Application of TGFU Learning in

Volleyball Upper Passing Learning. Journal of Social Work and

Science Education. 2023;4(3):83-9. [DOI]

26. Bruijn AGMd, Greeff JWd, Temlali TY, Oosterlaan J,

Smith JK, Hartman E. Objectively Measured Physical Activity During

Primary School Physical Education Predicts Intrinsic Motivation

Independently of Academic Achievement Level. British Journal of

Educational Psychology. 2022;93(S1):90-112. [PMID: 35726452]

[DOI]

Additional Files

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Rezaee , M. ., Shakerian , S. ., Bahremand, S., & Ahmadpour, M. . (2025). Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Gymnastics Training Program and Teaching Games for Understanding on Improving Gross Motor Skills in Children Aged 4 to 11 Years. International Journal of Sport Studies for Health, 8(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.intjssh.8.1.7