Anthropometric and Physical Profile Among the Different Age Groups of Tunisian Tennis Players
Keywords:
Tennis, Physical Profile, Anthropometric, AgeAbstract
Background: The popularity of Tunisian tennis is on the rise, due to emerging players gaining global recognition, leading to growth and evolution in the sport. In order to optimize training and performance, coaches need valuable information on physical fitness and player profiling. Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the physical profile of Tunisian tennis players in different age groups ranging from 7 to 17 years. Methods: One hundred and one tennis players from the same team were assigned to six age groups (U9-U18); U9 (7.89 ± 0.32), U10 (8.88 ± 0.34), U11 (9.78 ± 0.43), U12 (10.81 ± 0.4), U14 (12.3 ± 0.73), and U18 (14.69 ± 0.95) and were assessed for standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump, medicine ball throw (MBT), various sprint distances, agility drills, 20m Shuttle run (20mSRT), and Sit and reach tests. Results: The results showed that U14 and U18 age groups demonstrated better performance than U9 and U10 in jump tests, while U18 and U14 outperformed only U9 in the MBT test. U11 showed better performance than U9 and U10 in sprints, sideways shuffle, and spider drill tests. U9 and U10 had lower performance than U12 in SLJ, 20m sprint, sideways shuffle, and zigzag tests, and U11 outperformed U9 in the SLJ test. U18 and U14 had higher VO2max than U10 and U11, while U12 was higher than U11 only. No difference in flexibility was reported. The centile estimates of physical performances among Tunisian tennis players provide a means to compare individual player test results with the standard performance levels of the group. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study found that 11–17-year-old players exhibited greater physical performance than 7–10-year-old players. However, no age effect was found for flexibility.
Downloads
References
1. Fernandez-Fernandez J, Sanz-Rivas D, Mendez-Villanueva A. A
Review of the Activity Profile and Physiological Demands of Tennis
Match Play. Strength Cond J. 2009;31(4):15–26. [PubMed ID: 19197208].
https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181ada1cb.
2. Fernandez J, Mendez-Villanueva A, Pluim BM. Intensity of tennis
match play. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(5):387–91. discussion 391.
[PubMed ID: 16632566]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2653872].
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.023168.
3. Gomes RV, Ribeiro SML, Veibig RF, Aoki MS. [Food intake and
anthropometric profile of amateur and professionals tennis players].
Rev Bras de Medicina do Esporte. 2009;15(6):436–40. Portuguese.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-86922009000700007.
4. Kovacs MS. Tennis physiology: training the competitive
athlete. Sports Med. 2007;37(3):189–98. [PubMed ID: 17326695].
https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737030-00001.
5. Kovacs MS. Applied physiology of tennis performance. Br J Sports Med.
2006;40(5):381–5. discussion 386. [PubMed ID: 16632565]. [PubMed
Central ID: PMC2653871]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.023309.
6. Ulbricht A, Fernandez-Fernandez J, Mendez-Villanueva A, Ferrauti
A. Impact of Fitness Characteristics on Tennis Performance in Elite
Junior Tennis Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(4):989–98. [PubMed
ID: 26605803]. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001267.
7. Reid M, Duffield R, Dawson B, Baker J, Crespo M. Quantification of
the physiological and performance characteristics of on-court tennis
drills. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(2):146–51. discussion 151. [PubMed ID:
17681984]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.036426.
8. Kramer T, Huijgen B, Elferink-Gemser MT, Lyons J, Visscher C. Physical
development of young talented tennis players. Digitalis. 2010:93–114.
https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0506-7_7.
9. Kurtz JA, Grazer J, Alban B, Martino M. Ability for tennis specific
variables and agility for determining the Universal Tennis Ranking
(UTR). Sports J. 2019.
10. Dobos K, Novak D, Barbaros P. Neuromuscular Fitness Is Associated
with Success in Sport for Elite Female, but NotMale Tennis Players. Int J
Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12). [PubMed ID: 34204221]. [PubMed
Central ID: PMC8296339]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126512.
11. Alricsson M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Werner S. Reliability of sports related
functional tests with emphasis on speed and agility in young athletes.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11(4):229–32. [PubMed ID: 11476428].
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2001.110406.x.
12. Svensson M, Drust B. Testing soccer players. J
Sports Sci. 2005;23(6):601–18. [PubMed ID: 16195009].
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021294.
13. Ab Rahman Z. Reliability, Validity, and Norm References of Standing
Broad Jump. Rev Gest Inovac Tecnol. 2021;11(3):1340–54.
14. Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre
shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6(2):93–101.
[PubMed ID: 3184250]. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418808729800.
15. Ayala F, Sainz de Baranda P, De Ste Croix M, Santonja
F. Criterion-related validity of four clinical tests used to
measure hamstring flexibility in professional futsal players.
Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(4):175–81. [PubMed ID: 22085711].
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.02.005.
16. Myburgh GK, Cumming SP, Coelho EM, Cooke K, Malina RM.
Growth and maturity status of elite British junior tennis
players. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(20):1957–64. [PubMed ID: 26930031].
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1149213.
17. Palaiothodorou D, Antoniou T, Vagenas G. Bone asymmetries
in the limbs of children tennis players: testing the combined
effects of age, sex, training time, and maturity status. J
Sports Sci. 2020;38(20):2298–306. [PubMed ID: 32543283].
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1779490.
18. Olcucu B, Vatansever S. Correlation Between Physical
Fitness and International Tennis Number (ITN) Levels
Among Children Tennis Players. Anthropol. 2017;21(1-2):137–42.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891803.
19. Yıldız S. Relationship between Functional Movement Screen and
Athletic Performance in Children Tennis Players. Univ J Educ Res.
2018;6(8):1647–51. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060803.
20. Berdejo del Fresno D, Vicente Rodríguez G, González Ravé JM,
Moreno LA, Rey López JP. Body composition and fitness in elite
Spanish children tennis players. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2010;5(2):250–64.
https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2010.52.13.
21. Rice RP, Roach K, Kirk-Sanchez N, Waltz B, Ellenbecker TS, Jayanthi
N, et al. Age and Gender Differences in Injuries and Risk Factors
in Elite Junior and Professional Tennis Players. Sports Health.
2022;14(4):466–77. [PubMed ID: 35037501]. [PubMed Central ID:
PMC9214903]. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211062834.
22. Sanchez-Munoz C, Sanz D, Zabala M. Anthropometric characteristics,
body composition and somatotype of elite junior tennis players. Br J
Sports Med. 2007;41(11):793–9. [PubMed ID: 17957016]. [PubMed Central
ID: PMC2465306]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.037119.
23. Torres G, Alacid F, Ferragut C, Villaverde C. Estudio
cineantropométrico del jugador de tenis adolescente. (Cinematic
anthropometric study of adolescent tennis players). Cult Cienc
Deporte. 2006;2(4):27–32. https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v2i4.172.
24. Karnia M, Garsztka T, Rynkiewicz M, Rynkiewicz T, Zurek P,
Łuszczyk M, et al. Physical Performance, Body Composition
and Body Balance in Relation to National Ranking Positions
in Young Polish Tennis Players. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2010;2(2).
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10131-0011-z.
25. Luna-Villouta P, Paredes-Arias M, Flores-Rivera C,
Hernandez-Mosqueira C, Souza de Carvalho R, Faundez-Casanova C,
et al. Anthropometric Characterization and Physical Performance by
Age and Biological Maturation in Young Tennis Players. Int J Environ
Res Public Health. 2021;18(20). [PubMed ID: 34682639]. [PubMed
Central ID: PMC8535686]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010893.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
