Long-Term Outcomes of Early Developmental Support Programs
Keywords:
Long-Term Outcomes, Early Developmental, Support, Early Programs, Support ProgramsAbstract
Early developmental support programs have long been recognized for their potential to significantly enhance the cognitive, social, and emotional development of children. These programs, which often combine educational, nutritional, and family support components, are designed to provide children, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds, with the skills and resources needed for a successful start in life. This letter aims to highlight the long-term outcomes of early developmental support programs, drawing on recent research to emphasize their importance and effectiveness. Early developmental support programs are vital for fostering the cognitive, social, and emotional development of children, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. These programs, which often integrate educational, nutritional, and family support components, have demonstrated significant long-term benefits, including improved academic achievement, reduced behavioral problems, and enhanced parental satisfaction. As research continues to underscore the importance of early intervention, it is crucial to invest in and expand these programs to ensure that all children have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Downloads
References
Black, M. M., Pérez‐Escamilla, R., & Rao, S. F. (2015). Integrating Nutrition and Child Development Interventions: Scientific Basis, Evidence of Impact, and Implementation Considerations. Advances in Nutrition, 6(6), 852-859. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.010348
Chandler, L. K., Fowler, S. A., & Lubeck, R. C. (1986). Assessing Family Needs: The First Step in Providing Family-Focused Intervention. Diagnostique, 11(3-4), 233-245.https://doi.org/10.1177/073724778601100307
DesJardin, J. L. (2005). Maternal Perceptions of Self-Efficacy and Involvement in the Auditory Development of Young Children With Prelingual Deafness. Journal of Early Intervention, 27(3), 193-209.https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510502700306
DiGirolamo, A., Stansbery, P., & Lung'aho, M. (2014). Advantages and Challenges of Integration: Opportunities for Integrating Early Childhood Development and Nutrition Programming. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1308(1), 46-53.https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12323
Ghasemzadeh, A. (2023). Advancements in Technology-Based Assessment and Intervention for Children With Developmental Disorders. KMAN Counsel and Psych Nexus, 1(1), 179-182.https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.psychnexus.1.1.20
Grey, I., Coughlan, B., Lydon, H., Healy, O., & Thomas, J. (2017). Parental Satisfaction With Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 23(3), 373-384.https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629517742813
O’Connor, A., Nolan, A., Bergmeier, H., Williams-Smith, J., & Skouteris, H. (2018). Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions of Parent–child Relationships: A Qualitative Study. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(1), 4-15.https://doi.org/10.23965/ajec.43.1.01
Reynolds, A. J. (2005). Confirmatory Program Evaluation: Applications to Early Childhood Interventions. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2401-2425.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00597.x
Ussher, J. M., Charter, R., Parton, C., & Perz, J. (2016). Constructions and Experiences of Motherhood in the Context of an Early Intervention for Aboriginal Mothers and Their Children: Mother and Healthcare Worker Perspectives. BMC public health, 16(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3312-6
Zigler, E., Taussig, C., & Black, K. N. (1992). Early Childhood Intervention: A Promising Preventative for Juvenile Delinquency. American psychologist, 47(8), 997-1006.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.47.8.997
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
