Digital Transformation and Changes in Corporate Governance Structures: A Qualitative Study of Leading Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange
Objective: This study aimed to explore and explain how digital transformation changes corporate governance structures, decision-making processes, monitoring mechanisms, accountability relationships, and governance capabilities in leading companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange.
Methods and Materials: This study employed an exploratory qualitative design. Participants consisted of 20 senior managers, board members, digital transformation and information technology managers, internal audit and risk-management executives, and financial and strategic management specialists from leading companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Participants were selected through purposive criterion-based sampling, and sampling continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 45 to 70 minutes. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis with the assistance of MAXQDA software. The analytical process included open coding, axial coding, selective integration, constant comparison, and the development of overarching themes. Credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability were strengthened through iterative analysis, member checking, documentation of coding decisions, and comparison of interpretations with the original transcripts.
Findings: Analysis of the interviews generated 50 initial conceptual codes, which were consolidated into 14 axial categories and three overarching themes. The first theme, digital reconfiguration of strategic decision-making and board functioning, included real-time access to strategic information, data-driven decision-making, redistribution of decision authority, digitalization of board processes, and increasing demand for digital expertise. The second theme, transformation of monitoring, control, transparency, and risk governance, included automated internal controls, continuous monitoring, enhanced transparency, digital audit and compliance, and cybersecurity and data-governance risks. The third theme, redesign of governance relationships, accountability, and organizational capabilities, included reduced information asymmetry, transformation of stakeholder communication, changes in accountability relationships, and development of digital governance capabilities. Overall, the findings showed that digital transformation altered the distribution of information, authority, control, expertise, and responsibility within corporate governance systems.
Conclusion: Digital transformation should be understood as a governance transformation rather than merely a technological modernization process, because it simultaneously reshapes board functioning, strategic decision-making, monitoring, accountability, risk oversight, and governance competencies. Effective outcomes therefore depend on aligning technological adoption with board-level digital literacy, data governance, internal controls, cybersecurity oversight, and interdisciplinary governance capabilities.