Paradigm Model of Factors Affecting Academic Guidance for Appropriate Distribution of Students in Existing Disciplines with a Mixed Approach

Yahya Salari; Maryam Eslampanah; Susan Laei; Faranak Mosavi

doi:10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.29

Authors

Yahya Salari PhD student, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0985-9618
Maryam Eslampanah Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3446-0588
Susan Laei Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management , Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-4837
Faranak Mosavi Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-8991

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.29

Keywords:

Educational guidance model, population distribution, students, foundation data

Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of the current research was to provide a paradigmatic model of factors affecting academic guidance for the appropriate distribution of students in existing fields. Method: This research is applied in terms of purpose and mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of study method. The statistical population of this research in the qualitative part was education experts of Kermanshah city (2021-2022). The statistical population of this research in the qualitative part was the education experts of Kermanshah city (2021-2022), which was carried out by purposeful sampling until data saturation, and in the quantitative part, it included all the principals of second-year secondary schools (150 people) who They were selected by the whole number method. The research tool in the quantitative part consisted of a researcher-made questionnaire and in-depth interview in the quantitative part. Data analysis was done in the qualitative part by open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, and in the second part by structural equation modeling. Results: In general, the results of the research showed that the causal conditions of academic guidance were based on five core codes, test, academic guidance, academic attitude, motivation and grade. background conditions with three core codes (preparation of the counseling field, counseling mechanisms, and counseling services), intervention conditions including six core codes (parents of students, lack of planning, lack of attention of teachers and school counselors, unemployment of graduates, bias field, neglecting technical fields), the strategic conditions included three selective codes: psychological strategy, supervisory strategy and information strategy; Outcome conditions including two central codes, external efficiency and internal efficiency were obtained. Conclusion: The results showed that the studied model had a relatively favorable fit

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

عسگری، علی؛ آتش‌روز، بابک؛ پاکدامن، شهال و همکاران. (1399). پیش‌بینی پیشرفت تحصیلی از طریق میزان وابستگی. فصلنامه خانواده پژوهشی، 16(3)، 55-63.

آذرنیوه، مرضیه‌السادات و خورمیزی، سیدعلیرضا. (1390). افسردگی و پیشرفت تحصیلی در دانشجویان ورزشکار و غیرورزشکار: یک مطالعه مقایسه‌ای. مرکز تحقیقات مراقبت‌های پرستاری دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران، 22(16)، 3-31.

شکوهی. (1362). مبانی و اصول آموزش و پرورش و ضوابط آن / آیین‌نامه آموزش و پرورش.

بلوم، بی. اس. (1392). ویژگی‌های آدمی و یادگیری آموزشگاهی. ترجمه علی‌اکبر سیف. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.

پریشانی، نیره و نیلفروشان، پریسا. (1396). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر هدایت تحصیلی و شغلی دانش‌آموزان نظام جدید متوسطه آموزش و پرورش. فصلنامه دانش و پژوهش در روانشناسی کاربردی، 17(3)، 63-72.

درتاج، فریبرز. (1393). مقایسه تأثیر دو روش آموزش به شیوه بازی و سنتی بر انگیزه و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان. مجله روان‌شناسی مدرسه، 2(1)، 26-21.

درتاج، فریبرز؛ لک‌پور، الهام و بهلولی، علی. (1392). بررسی میزان تأثیر مدارس هوشمند استان لرستان بر پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان مقطع متوسطه. نشریه علمی-پژوهشی فناوری آموزش، 2(2)، 333-303.

رخصت‌طلب، کاظم. (1395). بررسی تنگناهای هدایت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان در نظام جدید آموزش متوسطه. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران جنوب.

زرافشان، علی. (1395). هدایت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان چگونه انجام می‌شود؟ رشد آموزش فنی‌وحرفه‌ای و کاردانش، 13، 22-22.

شفیع‌آبادی، عبدالله. (1396). بررسی مسائل و مشکلات انتخاب شغل. همایش نقش راهنمایی و مشاوره شغلی در بازار کار، تهران، وزارت کار.

شیوه‌نامه اجرایی هدایت تحصیلی. (1391). مصوب شورای برنامه‌ریزی هدایت تحصیلی-شغلی.

شیوه‌نامه اجرایی هدایت تحصیلی. (1396). مصوب شورای برنامه‌ریزی هدایت تحصیلی-شغلی.

علیدوست ابدیخواه، محمدعلی. (1391). تحقیق درباره ملاک‌ها و ضوابط هدایت تحصیلی، محاسبه و تعیین همبستگی بین نمرات دروس توصیه‌نامه تحصیلی و موفقیت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان رشته‌های مختلف متوسطه نظری، فنی‌وحرفه‌ای شهر تهران و بررسی علایق تحصیلی و شغلی و عوامل مؤثر در انتخاب رشته تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان. طرح پژوهشی، وزارت آموزش‌وپرورش.

زندوانیان، احمد؛ کرمدوست، نوروزعلی و ابوالقاسمی، محمود. (1396). طراحی الگوی مناسب جهت هدایت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دوره متوسطه. مجله روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، 36(2)، 330-322.

Ajanovski, V. (2018). Personalized Long-Term Student Guidance Towards Graduation. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 1449-1454.

Brew, E. A., Nketiah, B., & Koranteng, R. (2021). A literature review of academic performance, an insight into factors and their influences on academic outcomes of students at senior high schools. Open Access Library Journal, 8(6), 1-14.

Cholewa, B., Hull, M. F., Babcock, C. R., & Smith, A. D. (2018). Predictors and academic outcomes associated with in-school suspension. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 191.

Galvin, R. (2015). How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? Journal of Building Engineering, 1, 2-12.

Iatrellis, O., Kameas, A., & Fitsilis, P. (2017). Academic advising systems: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Education Sciences, 7(4), 90.

Jama, M. P. (2016). Academic guidance for undergraduate students in a South African medical school: Can we guide them all? Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 4(2), 13-24.

Jaradat, M. S., & Mustafa, M. B. (2017). Academic advising and maintaining major: Is there a relation? Social Sciences, 6(4), 151.

Jarvin, L., & Subotnik, R. F. (2021). Understanding elite talent in academic domains: A developmental trajectory from basic abilities to scholarly productivity/artistry. In The Handbook of Secondary Gifted Education, 217-235.

Jeeng, A., Boyle, K., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2008). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 44.

Kaso, N., Nurjihad, A., Ilham, D., & Aswar, N. (2021). Facebook and its Impact on Students' Learning Achievement at State Islamic High School of Palopo. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 1-15.

Lawton, J. (2018). Academic advising as a catalyst for equity. New Directions for Higher Education, 2018(184), 33-43.

McCray, C. R., Beachum, F. D., & Reggio, P. F. (2021). School leadership in a diverse society: Helping schools prepare all students for success. IAP.

Mimis, M., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., Guejdi, A. O., Douzi, H., & Mammass, D. (2019). A framework for smart academic guidance using educational data mining. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1379-1393.

Mu, L., & Fosnacht, K. (2019). Effective advising: How academic advising influences student learning outcomes in different institutional contexts. The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1283-1307.

Paschal, M. J., & Mkulu, D. G. (2021). Teacher-Students’ Relationship and Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Magu District, Tanzania.

Rezapur-Shahkolai, F., Salimi, N., Parsa, P., Ezzati Rastgar, K., Gheysvandi, E., & Dogonchi, M. (2022). Faculty Members’ Experiences of the Challenges and Facilitators of the Student Academic Guidance and Academic Counseling Process: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 11(1), 19-26.

Rowell, L., & Hong, E. (2013). Academic motivation: Concepts, strategies, and counseling approaches. Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 2156759X1701600301.

Setiawan, R. R., Suwondo, S., & Syafii, W. (2021). Implementation of Project Based Learning Student Worksheets to Improve Students' Science Process Skills on Environmental Pollution in High Schools. Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 130-140.

Supriyanto, A., Hartini, S., Syamsudin, S., & Sutoyo, A. (2019). Indicators of professional competencies in research of Guidance and Counseling Teachers. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 9(1), 53-64.

To'lanovich, E. S. (2021). Vocational Guidance in General Secondary Schools. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 460-466.

Walker, R. V., Zelin, A. I., Behrman, C., & Strnad, R. (2017). Qualitative analysis of student perceptions: “Some advisors care. Some don't.” NACADA Journal, 37(2), 44-54.

Wong, K., Kwan, R., Leung, K., & Wang, F. L. (2014). Facebook’s potential for personal, social, academic and career development for higher education students. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 16(2), 203-220.

Wong, M. M. H., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience. In Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education, 437-465.