Analyzing the effective components in the formation of analytical literacy of teenagers

Majid Ebadi Sharafabad; Shahram Ranjdoust; Mohammad Azimi

doi:10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.33

Authors

Majid Ebadi Sharafabad PhD student, Department of Educational Sciences, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-2186
Shahram Ranjdoust Assistant Professor of the Department of Educational Sciences, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2020-9525
Mohammad Azimi Assistant Professor of the Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-6945

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.33

Keywords:

analytical literacy, secondary education, grand theory, formation process

Abstract

Background and Aim: Argumentative discourse plays a central role in public and intellectual communication, and people need to be able to read and analyze topics, so the main goal of the research was to identify the components of the formation of analytical literacy in teenagers and to present a model. Method: In terms of its purpose, this research is a part of applied research, and the qualitative research method is grand theory. In this research, experts' opinions have been studied and explored. The statistical population of this research was all secondary education professors and teachers in 2019, 30 of whom had at least 15 years of teaching experience and a doctorate degree in the field of educational sciences, curriculum planning, and educational management, were selected through available sampling. Data analysis was done by coding interviews and then quantifying and using structural equations by Smart PLS software. Results: The results of the research showed that in terms of causal factors (planning and management, making schools smarter, avoiding the consequences of unipolar education), background factors (analytical literacy promotion infrastructure, study tools and techniques), intervening factors (literacy management) students, time management), strategies and measures (teaching critical thinking, creating a learning environment and students' participation in the educational structure, publishing books) consequences (developing competence, analytical literacy, strengthening analytical power) were identified. Conclusion: Analytical literacy, either alone or as a necessary literacy for the effectiveness of other types of literacy (including media, internet and critical literacy) can have double importance in the third millennium

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ابراهیمی، احمد؛ میرشاه جعفری، سید ابراهیم؛ ربانی، ابراهیم؛ خوراسگانی. (1388). شناسایی و تبیین بایسته‌های یادگیری پروژه‌محور، متناسب با ویژگی‌های نسلی دانشجویان امروز. مجله مطالعات آموزش و یادگیری، 11(3)، 213-227.

درتاج، فاطمه و شه‌میری، بیوک. (1388). بررسی رابطه کارکردهای اجرایی با راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم دانش‌آموزان دختر متوسطه اول شهر سراوان در سال تحصیلی 88-89. مطالعات روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، 7(3)، 703-728.

زرگوش، شکوفه؛ قیصربیگی، مینا؛ میرزایی، بیوک. (1388). تأثیر راهبرد یادگیری خودتنظیمی بر تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان. پیشرفت‌های نوین در روانشناسی، علوم تربیتی و آموزش و پرورش، 12(3)، 318-358.

ظهوریان، مینا و دستمرد، مادح. (1400). بررسی تأثیر آموزش مبتنی بر راهبردهای شناختی بر یادگیری و یادداری در دروس با ماهیت درکی، حفظی و کلامی. نهمین کنفرانس ملی توسعه پایدار در علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، مطالعات اجتماعی و فرهنگی، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/1239251

نوده، هلیا. (1400). ارتباط بین راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم و عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان در درس زبان انگلیسی. فصلنامه مطالعات روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، 7(3)، 73-75.

Aguilar, S. H. (2022). Expanding the Self: Open Relationships and the Path to Self-Actualization (Doctoral dissertation, Pacifica Graduate Institute).

Breitwieser, J., & Brod, G. (2021). Cognitive prerequisites for generative learning: Why some learning strategies are more effective than others. Child Development, 92(1), 258-272.

Budhai, S. S. (2021). Best practices in engaging online learners through active and experiential learning strategies. Routledge.

Cook, E., Kennedy, E., & McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of teaching metacognitive learning strategies on performance in general chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(8), 961-967.

da Silva, N., & Carbonneau, H. (2021). Self-actualization and self-efficacy in the elderly in a ludic italian language learning program: a theoretical framework. LICERE - Revista do Programa de Pós-graduação Interdisciplinar em Estudos do Lazer, 24(1), 78-105.

Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-11.

Jiang, L., Zhang, S., Li, X., & Luo, F. (2021). How grit influences high school students’ academic performance and the mediation effect of academic self-efficacy and cognitive learning strategies. Current Psychology, 1-10.

Kadioglu-Akbulut, C., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2021). Implementation of self-regulatory instruction to promote students’ achievement and learning strategies in the high school chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 12-29.

Ludeking, A. (2022). The Use of Drama Therapeutic Play and Unconditional Positive Regard in Fostering Self-Actualization in Unhoused Individuals.

McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 462-476.

Matcha, W., Gasevic, D., Uzir, N. A. A., Jovanovic, J., Pardo, A., Lim, L., ... & Tsai, Y. S. (2020). Analytics of Learning Strategies: Role of Course Design and Delivery Modality. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(2), 45-71.

Mason, K. P. (2021). Leveraging Self-Awareness & Self Actualization to Maximize Outcomes. In Transparent and Authentic Leadership (pp. 1-15). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2020). Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies – How do they affect one another? Learning and Instruction, 66, 101285.

Pawlak, M. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 817-835.

Shi, C. (2011). A Study of the Relationship between Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. Higher Education Studies, 1(1), 20-26.

Stefanou, C. R., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. (2002). Developing motivation and cognitive learning strategies through an undergraduate learning community. Learning Environments Research, 5(1), 77-97.

Sun, L. (2013). The effect of meta-cognitive learning strategies on English learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2004.

Syafryadin, S. (2020). Students’ strategies in learning speaking: experience of two Indonesian schools. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(1), 34-47.