Providing a Framework for Math Curriculum Elements in the Process of Competent Teacher Training and Educating the Second Grade of Highschool Students

Leila Omrani; Yousef Adib; Jahangir Yari

doi:10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.38

Authors

Leila Omrani Ph.D candidate in Curriculum Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1817-7846
Yousef Adib Professor, Department of educational sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3030-0763
Jahangir Yari Associate Professor, Department of educational sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-4931

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.38

Keywords:

Curriculum Elements, Competent-based, Teacher, Students, Education, Math Course

Abstract

Background and Aim: The present article aimed at providing a framework of math curriculum elements in the process of competent teacher training and educating the students in second grade of high schools. Method: The research method was phenomenology qualitative and the statistical society were all professors and experts of curriculum planning in Tabriz universities during 2021-2022. The sample case was selected up to theoretical saturation (15 people) from the expert professors and the data was gathered through semi structural deep interviews in snowball sampling method. The validity of interviews was inner validity and the reliability was increased by applying it in an appropriate space considering the qualification of the interview without any bias and applying personal opinion. Results: Through analyzing the data in “content analysis” method obtained from the interviews with the experts, 144 categorized coding in 133 sub-themes and four basic themes were identified as the elements of math curriculum in the process of competent teachers training and educating the second grade of high school students; 1. Curriculum purposes in three sub-themes of pedagogical knowledge in ten categorized codes- learning disciplines and course subjects resulting of ten categorized codes- general and professional skills development derived from thirteen categorized codes, 2. the content of curriculum in four sub-themes consisted of the content knowledge resulting from thirteen categorized codes- the pedagogical knowledge in twelve categorized codes- the pedagogical content knowledge resulting from twelve categorized codes- the technological pedagogical content knowledge in seven categorized codes, 3. teaching- learning activities in three subthemes: the knowledge resulting from four categorized codes- the skill in fifteen categories codes- the attitude resulting from ten categorized codes and 4. Evaluation features in three sub-themes of the knowledge in ten categorized codes- the skill resulting from eight categorized codes- the attitude in ten categories codes. Conclusion: Hence, these for elements with thirteen indexes are the basic elements of math curriculum in the process of competent teachers training and educating the second grade of high school students. According to this fact that the schools provide a situation through which the students can achieve better learning and education opportunities, therefore, it is vital to create students’ better learning situation through training a competent teacher in math teaching by implementing these curriculum elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

امانی تهرانی، مهدی. (1395). کتاب‌های درسی تنها وسیله یادگیری نیستند. فصلنامه تخصصی ساماندهی منابع آموزشی، 3، 57-51.

عبدالهی، حسن؛ زین‌آبادی، شهره؛ حسین‌پور طوالزادهی، حسین؛ عباسیان، بیژن. (1396). آموزش و یادگیری پژوهش‌محور در محیط ساختن‌گرا: طراحی مدلی بر اساس پژوهش پدیدارنگارانه. فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی تعلیم و تربیت، 33(1)، 1-3.

حضرتی، علی. (1396). بررسی وضعیت یادگیری مشارکتی در دوره ابتدایی. سومین همایش ملی مطالعات و تحقیقات نوین در حوزه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی ایران، تهران.

رفیعی افوسی، حمید. (1397). یادگیری خارج از مدرسه. تهران: نشر پژوهشگر برتر.

ذوالقدرنسب، محسن؛ اسمعیلی، رضا؛ مرادی، محسن. (1393). بهره‌گیری از وسایل کمک‌آموزشی و تأثیر مثبت آنها در یادگیری دانش‌آموزان دوره ابتدایی. دومین همایش علمی پژوهشی آسیب‌های اجتماعی و فرهنگی علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی ایران.

سلیمان‌نژاد، اکبر؛ وفایی‌مهر، محمد. (1393). منابع یادگیری در تعلیم و تربیت. تهران: سمت.

سیادت، سیدعلی؛ محرابی کوشکی، حسینعلی؛ افشاری، بهمن. (1397). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر در سهل‌انگاری در نظام آموزشی و راه‌های کاهش آن بر اساس آموزه‌های اسلامی. مجله معارف اسلامی، 23(47)، 201-235.

اسدزاده، حسن؛ سعدی‌پور، رویا؛ عباسی‌اصل، اسماعیل؛ محمدجعفری، مهدی. (1395). مقایسه اثربخشی سه روش یادگیری مشارکتی بر مهارت‌های اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه دوم راهنمایی. رویکردهای نوین آموزشی، 11(1)، 315-320.

قلی‌پور، سرشین؛ شیرزاد، نگین؛ دهقان، لیلا؛ حسینی، کلثوم. (1395). بررسی نقش بازی‌های آموزشی و کلاسی بر میزان یادگیری دانش‌آموزان مقطع ابتدایی. سومین همایش ملی راهکارهای توسعه و ترویج علوم تربیتی، روانشناسی، مشاوره و آموزش در ایران.

شفیعی، مریم؛ خوسبخت، رحمت‌الله؛ مرزوقی، خاطره؛ محمدی، فریبا؛ محمدجعفری، مهدی. (1397). مطالعه تجربی تأثیر آموزش تفکر ژرف‌اندیشانه بر یادگیری پژوهش‌محور دانش‌آموزان در درس علوم ابتدایی. فصلنامه علمی روش‌ها و مدل‌های روانشناختی، 9(32)، 313-331.

Akin-Sabuncu, S. (2022). Towards a Re-conceptualisation of the Role of Teacher Educators in a Changing World: A Critical Pedagogy Perspective. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1).

Ansari, N. M. S. (2022). Critical Thinking and Scientific Approach in EFL Context: A Literature Review. CaLLs (Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics), 7(2), 145-160.

Aranzabal, A., Epelde, E., & Artetxe, M. (2022). Team formation on the basis of Belbin’s roles to enhance students’ performance in project based learning. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38, 22-37.

Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J. A., & Jones, S. G. (Eds.). (2012). International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Buchanan, J., Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Maher, D. (2019). Promoting Environmental Education for Primary School-aged Students Using Digital Technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2).

Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. C. (2019). Tablet-based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology.

Díaz-Millón, M., & Rivera-Trigueros, I. (2022). Can We Assess Creativity? The Use of Rubrics for Evaluating Transcreation in the Undergraduate Program of Translation and Interpreting. In Perspectives and Trends in Education and Technology (pp. 153-162). Springer, Singapore.

Eyler, J., & Giles Jr, D. (2014). The importance of program quality in service-learning. In Service-learning (pp. 75-94). Routledge.

Gerholz, K. H., Liszt, V., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2018). Effects of learning design patterns in service learning courses. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 47-59.

Hahn, T. W., Hatcher, J. A., Price, M. F., & Studer, M. L. (2018). Service Learning Courses.

Hayes, C., & Graham, S. (2018). Proposing an Eight Stage Model of Academic Curriculum Development via Knowledge Co-Construction with Students.

Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Alas, Y., Qodriah, S. L., Dacholfany, M. I., & Jamsari, E. A. (2018). Empowering civic responsibility: Insights from service learning. In Engaged Scholarship and Civic Responsibility in Higher Education (pp. 144-165). IGI Global.

Iyer, R., Carrington, S., Mercer, L., & Selva, G. (2018). Critical service-learning: promoting values orientation and enterprise skills in pre-service teacher programmes. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 133-147.

Kirby, S., Held, F. P., Jones, D., & Lyle, D. (2018). Growing health partnerships in rural and remote communities: what drives the joint efforts of primary schools and universities in maintaining service learning partnerships? Primary Health Care Research & Development, 1-15.

Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates' approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170-179.

Segalàs, J., & Tejedor, G. (2017). Service Learning for Engineering Education for Sustainability. New competences in Engineering Education in the area of sustainability and university social responsibility, 8.

Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., ... & Tran, V. M. (2020). A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell, 180(4), 688-702.

Strachan, S. M., Marshall, S., Murray, P., Coyle, E. J., & Sonnenberg-Klein, J. (2019). Using Vertically Integrated Projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduate curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.