Identifying the Dimensions and Components of the Inhibiting and Promoting Factors of the Strategic Plan for the Talent Identification of Adolescent Athletes

Mohammad sadegh Atr iyan; Ali Zarei; Farideh Ashraf Ganjavi

doi:10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.7

Authors

Mohammad sadegh Atr iyan Department of Sports Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-5674
Ali Zarei Department of Sports Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-8325
Farideh Ashraf Ganjavi Department of Sports Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-7687

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.2.1.7

Keywords:

Inhibiting factors, Promoting factors, Strategic plan, Talent identification, Adolescent athletes.

Abstract

Background and Aim: The strategic plan for the talent identification of athletes can play an important role in improving sports success. Therefore, the current research was carried out with the aim of identifying the dimensions and components of the inhibiting and promoting factors of the strategic plan for the talent identification of adolescent athletes. Methods: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was descriptive. The research population was experts and managers of the billiards federation, coaches of national and club billiards teams and heads of the talent identification committee, which according to the principle of theoretical saturation number of 13 people of them were selected as a sample with using the purposive sampling method. The research tool was semi-structured interview, which its validity was confirmed by triangulation method and its reliability by coefficient of agreement between two coders was obtained 0.86, and the data obtained from its implementation were analyzed by open, axial and selective coding method. Results: The results showed that the strategic plan for the talent identification of adolescent athletes for inhibiting factors were included 42 components in 8 dimensions of managerial barriers, contextual barriers, support and financial barriers, organizational barriers, media barriers, infrastructure barriers, structural barriers and cultural barriers, and for promoting factors were included 14 components in 2 dimensions of development platform factors and growth capacity factors. Finally, the pattern of the inhibiting and promoting factors of the strategic plan for the talent identification of adolescent athletes was drawn. Conclusion: The results of this study can have practical implications for the experts and planners of talent identification of athletes and considering the inhibiting and promoting factors take an effective step towards improving the talent identification of adolescent athletes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

هاشمی مطلق، شقایق؛ اصالنخانی، محمدعلی؛ و صفانیا، علی‌محمد. (۱۳۹۲). اثر محیط ادراک‌شده و حمایت اجتماعی بر مشارکت در فعالیت بدنی اوقات فراغت کارکنان منطقه سیزده دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی. رویکردهای نوین در مدیریت ورزشی، ۲(۶)، ۱۳–۲۹.

مسعودی، حمید؛ و اصغرپور ماسوله، احمدرضا. (۱۳۹۲). بررسی جامعه‌شناختی عوامل مؤثر بر تمایل به ورزش در سازمان، مورد مطالعه: شرکت برق منطقه‌ای خراسان رضوی. پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی، ۱۰(۲۶)، ۱۱–۲۲.

Beard, J. G., & Ragheb, M. G. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 20–33.

Blasche, G. W., Arlinghaus, A., & Dorner, T. E. (2014). Leisure opportunities and fatigue in employees: A large cross-sectional study. Leisure Sciences, 36(3), 235–250.

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131–164.

Duerden, M. D., Courtright, S. H., & Widmer, M. A. (2018). Why people play at work: A theoretical examination of leisure-at-work. Leisure Sciences, 40(6), 634–648.

Florida, R. (2014). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Liang, Y. W., & Liou, Y. C. (2021). Relationships between social support and satisfaction—moderating role of facilitation. Leisure Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2021.1948597

Liang, Y. W. (2018). Conceptualization and measurement of work–leisure facilitation. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(2), 109–132.

Liang, Y. W. (2019). Consequences of work–leisure facilitation from tour leaders’/guides’ perspectives: Self-efficacy and satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 1–24.

Lin, J. H., Wong, J. Y., & Ho, C. H. (2013). Promoting frontline employees' quality of life: Leisure benefit systems and work-to-leisure conflicts. Tourism Management, 36, 178–187.

McGillivray, D. (2005). Governing working bodies through leisure. Leisure Sciences, 27(4), 315–330.

Rojek, C. (2010). The Labour of Leisure: The Culture of Free Time. London, UK: Sage.

Snir, R., & Harpaz, I. (2002). Work-leisure relations: Leisure orientation and the meaning of work. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 178–203.

Sylvester, C. (1999). The Western idea of work and leisure: Traditions, transformations, and the future. Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty-First Century, 17–33.

Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work–family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63–76.